Do you agree or disagree with mandatory motor vehicle insurance?
Dec.15, 2011 in
Motor Insurance
Just a problem I imagined I would throw out there.
Explain your place, if you don’t thoughts. Thank you.
Best response:
Response by Mrs Wilkins
I concur with it becuase I have been in an accident with uninsured motorist and they can genuinely screw you! Also, I assume it is often great to defend oneself and your possessions from irresponsible motorists
What do you feel? Answer below!
December 15th, 2011 at 8:15 am
Agree with it. If people are going to operate a car (which is quite dangerous) they need to be responsible enough to have insurance. Cars are expensive and, in an accident, can cause a great deal of monetary damage. It would be unfair if someone were to run into another person and not have insurance to pay for the damages. I would be pissed if that happens to me, and even with the insurance requirement, this still happens frequently.
It’s not cheap and it is doubtless that some people can’t afford it. However, those people should (a) use public transportation, (b) carpool with others, or (c) find a way to pay for at least liability insurance.
December 15th, 2011 at 9:15 am
Of course there should be insurance because why sould you not pay and reap the benifits if there is a wreck. Or our you one who thinks The Goverment should cover everyone.
December 15th, 2011 at 10:12 am
After being hit by two uninsured motorists (one actually backed up and into my car in a drive through), I think it should be mandatory.
December 15th, 2011 at 10:21 am
I disagree. I should not be compelled to purchase something that I can not afford. My car insurance cost as much as my car. Im serious.
Not to mention when I did get into an accident the insurance company was trying not to pay the claim. I had to call several times essentially begging these fukkers to pay for some shit that I already paid for through the premiums.
December 15th, 2011 at 11:12 am
I agree with the dude above me. I understand about danger. And it sucks if you get in an accident. But what purpose does it serve to suspend some poor guys driver license if he can’t afford insurance?
December 15th, 2011 at 11:20 am
I’m with the two who said they disagree. And to add to what they said::: For alot of people NEITHER car pooling, public transportation, or liability insurance are possible options.